H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dennis Ralston vs Charlie Pasarell H2H: 2-2
Dennis Ralston and Charlie Pasarell are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Dennis Ralston leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Charlie Pasarell leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Dennis Ralston won the 1974 Los Angeles second round 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 1974* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Dennis Ralston | 7-6 7-5 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1971* | Miami Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Dennis Ralston | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1970 | Denver | ATP 250 | RR | Hard | Charlie Pasarell | 6-4 | Dennis Ralston | Match data |
| Mar 27, 1969* | New York | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Charlie Pasarell | 8-6 3-6 6-3 | Dennis Ralston | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis Ralston | #287 | #115 | 0 | 1,954 | 157 | 136 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Charlie Pasarell | #312 | #35 | 0 | 1,939 | 302 | 275 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dennis Ralston | Charlie Pasarell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1968 | 48–25 | 65.8% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 43–31 | 58.1% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1969 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1970 | 41–28 | 59.4% | — | 1,893 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 26–32 | 44.8% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1971 | 27–21 | 56.2% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1972 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 40–31 | 56.3% | #47 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1973 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #219 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1974 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #147 | 1,680 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1975 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #187 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #56 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1976 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #248 | 1,545 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #294 | 1,563 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,557 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #312 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |