H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Dennis van Scheppingen vs Kent Kinnear H2H: 0-1
Kent Kinnear holds a 1–0 lead over Dennis van Scheppingen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kent Kinnear leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kent Kinnear won the 1992 Rosmalen third round 6-4 6-7(0) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 59
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1992* | Rosmalen | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Kent Kinnear | 6-4 6-7(0) 6-4 | Dennis van Scheppingen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis van Scheppingen | #1,545 | #72 | 552 | 1,666 | 42 | 73 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kent Kinnear | #1,299 | #163 | 212 | 1,564 | 9 | 22 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dennis van Scheppingen | Kent Kinnear | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #764 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #732 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1997 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #120 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #364 | 1,413 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #439 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #343 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #206 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #121 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #199 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #475 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1335 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #358 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |