H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dick Crealy vs Frank Sedgman H2H: 0-1
Frank Sedgman holds a 1–0 lead over Dick Crealy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frank Sedgman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Frank Sedgman won the 1969 Hobart fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 98
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 1969* | Hobart | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Frank Sedgman | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Dick Crealy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Crealy | #509 | #33 | 0 | 1,904 | 335 | 317 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Frank Sedgman | #662 | #237 | 0 | 1,655 | 26 | 31 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dick Crealy | Frank Sedgman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 30–23 | 56.6% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 31–33 | 48.4% | #51 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 41–40 | 50.6% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1975 | 41–37 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1976 | 46–34 | 57.5% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1977 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #68 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1978 | 19–33 | 36.5% | #131 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1979 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #274 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #309 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #318 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |