H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dick Crealy vs Harald Elschenbroich H2H: 2-0
Dick Crealy holds a 2–0 lead over Harald Elschenbroich in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dick Crealy leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Dick Crealy won the 1974 Bombay third round 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 85
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 1974* | Bombay | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Dick Crealy | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Harald Elschenbroich | Match data |
| Jul 27, 1972* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Dick Crealy | 6-3 6-4 6-3 | Harald Elschenbroich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Crealy | #509 | #33 | 0 | 1,904 | 335 | 317 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Harald Elschenbroich | #480 | #69 | 0 | 1,803 | 108 | 104 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dick Crealy | Harald Elschenbroich | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 30–23 | 56.6% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1973 | 31–33 | 48.4% | #51 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1974 | 41–40 | 50.6% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1975 | 41–37 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1976 | 46–34 | 57.5% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 8–7 | 53.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1977 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #68 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #135 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1978 | 19–33 | 36.5% | #131 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #145 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 1979 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #274 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #86 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #309 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #185 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #294 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #216 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #480 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |