H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dick Crealy vs Jean Loup Rouyer H2H: 1-2
Jean Loup Rouyer holds a 2–1 lead over Dick Crealy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jean Loup Rouyer leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Jean Loup Rouyer won the 1970 Indianapolis second round 8-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1970* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jean Loup Rouyer | 8-6 6-2 | Dick Crealy | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1970* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jean Loup Rouyer | 8-6 6-2 | Dick Crealy | Match data |
| Jul 15, 1970* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Dick Crealy | 6-4 6-1 6-3 | Jean Loup Rouyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Crealy | #509 | #33 | 0 | 1,904 | 335 | 317 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jean Loup Rouyer | #239 | #133 | 0 | 1,747 | 69 | 69 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dick Crealy | Jean Loup Rouyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1968 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1969 | 30–23 | 56.6% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1970 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1971 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1972 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1973 | 31–33 | 48.4% | #51 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #200 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1974 | 41–40 | 50.6% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1975 | 41–37 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1976 | 46–34 | 57.5% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1977 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #68 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1978 | 19–33 | 36.5% | #131 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1979 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #274 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #309 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |