H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dick Crealy vs Pat Cramer H2H: 1-1
Dick Crealy and Pat Cramer are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Dick Crealy won the 1976 Bermuda third round 6-7 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 1976* | Bermuda | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Dick Crealy | 6-7 6-1 6-3 | Pat Cramer | Match data |
| May 23, 1973* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Pat Cramer | 3-6 7-6 6-2 | Dick Crealy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Crealy | #509 | #33 | 0 | 1,904 | 335 | 317 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Pat Cramer | #389 | #95 | 0 | 1,668 | 62 | 103 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dick Crealy | Pat Cramer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1968 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1969 | 30–23 | 56.6% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1970 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1971 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1972 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #160 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1973 | 31–33 | 48.4% | #51 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1974 | 41–40 | 50.6% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 2–20 | 9.1% | #191 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1975 | 41–37 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1976 | 46–34 | 57.5% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1977 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #68 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #389 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1978 | 19–33 | 36.5% | #131 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1979 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #274 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #309 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |