H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Dick Crealy vs Robert Vant Hof H2H: 1-0

Dick Crealy holds a 1–0 lead over Robert Vant Hof in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dick Crealy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dick Crealy won the 1978 Cincinnati Open round of 64 4-6 6-2 6-3.

AUS Age 81 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dick Crealy #85 4-6 6-2 6-3 Robert Vant Hof Match data Jul 12, 1978* R64 Cincinnati Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dick Crealy #509 #33 0 1,903 338 317 51.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Robert Vant Hof 1,879 0 0 0 0 2 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Dick Crealy Robert Vant Hof
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 31–16 66.0% 1,646 0 0
1969 30–23 56.6% 1,639 0 0
1970 32–21 60.4% 1,700 0 1
1971 10–23 30.3% 1,598 0 1
1972 18–14 56.2% 1,716 0 1
1973 31–33 48.4% #51 1,623 0 1
1974 41–39 51.2% #71 1,719 0 1
1975 41–37 52.6% #56 1,738 0 2
1976 49–35 58.3% #38 1,783 0 2
1977 31–30 50.8% #67 1,672 0 2
1978 19–33 36.5% #131 1,567 0 2
1979 1–10 9.1% #274 1,498 0 2
1980 3–2 60.0% #309 1,511 0 2
1981 1–1 50.0% 1,509 0 2

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Dick Crealy Robert Vant Hof
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 15 9 24 62.5% 16 7 23 69.6% 1978 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1969 6 5 11 54.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1970 6 6 12 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 16 8 24 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0%
1971 2 4 6 33.3% 5 10 15 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1981 4 7 11 36.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
1972 2 2 4 50.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 1982 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
1973 4 5 9 44.4% 6 10 16 37.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 12 11 23 52.2% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1974 7 10 17 41.2% 17 17 34 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
1975 5 8 13 38.5% 21 15 36 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1976 12 4 16 75.0% 30 20 50 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1987 0 2 2 0.0%
1977 4 5 9 44.4% 19 16 35 54.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 1988 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
1978 2 5 7 28.6% 6 12 18 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1989 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
1979 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
1980 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
1981 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 53 58 111 47.7% 156 134 290 53.8% 97 76 173 56.1% 32 49 81 39.5% Career 42 43 85 49.4% 9 16 25 36.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 15 25 40 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Dick Crealy Robert Vant Hof
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1647 121.1 -10 +56 61.9% +0.86 8–4 (67%) +0.41 1978 1492 112.1 +23 33.3% -1.00 0–2 1–3 (25%) +0.05
1969 1640 118.3 +10 +67 +26 55.6% +0.27 5–8 (38%) +1.20 1979 1507 114.7 36.4% -1.09 0–1 3–2 (60%) -0.60
1970 1700 134.6 -75 +134 +67 59.1% +0.64 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 100.8 +0.35 1980 1593 123.7 -2 -34 -56 46.0% -0.57 3–3 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 104.7 +1.15
1971 1598 133.0 -33 +84 +121 29.9% -1.06 5–0 (100%) 2–3 (40%) 106.1 -4.26 1981 1667 131.2 +13 -127 -104 43.0% -0.43 5–5 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 97.9 -0.32
1972 1717 124.1 -157 +50 +30 55.6% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +1.63 1982 1691 125.8 +19 -146 54.2% +0.33 6–2 (75%) 7–5 (58%) 105.0 +3.05
1973 1624 127.7 +8 +31 +65 48.6% +0.01 7–8 (47%) 8–10 (44%) 97.6 +0.24 1983 1722 139.5 -34 -63 48.6% -0.15 8–3 (73%) 8–6 (57%) 107.1 -1.98
1974 1719 137.0 -67 -18 +78 51.5% +0.05 14–12 (54%) 14–17 (45%) 101.2 -0.63 1984 1580 107.4 -11 +27 34.0% -0.87 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 95.4 +0.46
1975 1738 138.0 -69 +20 +95 50.8% +0.12 16–8 (67%) 15–9 (63%) 110.1 -1.44 1985 1520 97.1 +10 28.6% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.84
1976 1783 142.6 -2 -8 +8 58.4% +0.68 14–16 (47%) 12–17 (41%) 93.6 +2.69 1987 1498 104.8 28.6% -1.86 0–1 -0.12
1977 1673 127.5 +57 +18 +45 49.7% -0.07 10–12 (45%) 10–7 (59%) 96.0 +1.90 1988 1524 125.6 +5 35.7% -0.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) -0.53
1978 1567 129.0 +98 +15 +91 40.5% -0.56 11–14 (44%) 3–13 (19%) 89.9 -0.07 1989 1555 113.9 +30 -5 48.1% -0.37 2–5 (29%) 5–1 (83%) 99.0 +0.26
1979 1499 117.0 +99 +43 +128 22.2% -1.18 0–3 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 93.2 -0.27 1990 1536 95.9 0.0% -3.00 +0.20
1980 1512 105.5 +100 50.0% +0.60 1–1 0–1 +1.27
1981 1510 100.0 50.0% -0.25 1–1 +0.51
Career 1904 135.4 -9 +24 +62 51.7% +0.15 101–98 (51%) 76–88 (46%) 95.7 +0.54 Career 1880 131.6 0 -86 -41 44.1% -0.42 29–29 (50%) 38–34 (53%) 102.6 +1.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.