H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Dick Norman vs Mark Knowles H2H: 0-1
Mark Knowles holds a 1–0 lead over Dick Norman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Knowles leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Knowles won the 1996 Roland Garros first round 5-7 6-3 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 55
Left-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Mark Knowles | 5-7 6-3 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Dick Norman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Norman | #882 | #85 | 456 | 1,629 | 27 | 66 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dick Norman | Mark Knowles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #501 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #377 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #237 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #569 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #166 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #108 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2006 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2007 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #157 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #304 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |