H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dick Stockton vs Charlie Pasarell H2H: 2-2
Dick Stockton and Charlie Pasarell are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Charlie Pasarell leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Dick Stockton won the 1973 Nottingham fourth round 9-8 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1973 | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Dick Stockton | 9-8 6-2 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1973* | Miami Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Dick Stockton | 6-4 6-2 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
| Nov 17, 1972* | Rotterdam Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Charlie Pasarell | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Dick Stockton | Match data |
| Jul 21, 1970* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Charlie Pasarell | 6-3 0-6 6-0 | Dick Stockton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Stockton | #808 | #8 | 0 | 2,122 | 386 | 267 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Charlie Pasarell | #312 | #35 | 0 | 1,939 | 302 | 275 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dick Stockton | Charlie Pasarell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,917 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1976 | 58–26 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 43–31 | 58.1% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1977 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,993 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1978 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 8 | 1971 | 26–32 | 44.8% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1979 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #138 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 40–31 | 56.3% | #47 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1981 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #98 | 1,750 | 0 | 8 | 1974 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,654 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,640 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #56 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,602 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #312 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |