H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dick Stockton vs Jim Mcmanus H2H: 2-3
Jim Mcmanus holds a 3–2 lead over Dick Stockton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Dick Stockton won the 1973 Toronto Wct fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
USA
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1973* | Toronto Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Dick Stockton | 6-2 6-4 | Jim Mcmanus | Match data |
| Jan 20, 1973* | Miami Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Dick Stockton | 6-2 6-4 | Jim Mcmanus | Match data |
| Jul 26, 1971* | Tanglewood | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jim Mcmanus | 2-6 6-2 7-6 | Dick Stockton | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1971* | Omaha | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Jim Mcmanus | 7-6 7-6 | Dick Stockton | Match data |
| Jul 24, 1969* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jim Mcmanus | 6-3 6-4 | Dick Stockton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Stockton | #808 | #8 | 0 | 2,122 | 386 | 267 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Jim Mcmanus | #418 | #90 | 0 | 1,730 | 132 | 222 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dick Stockton | Jim Mcmanus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,917 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1976 | 58–26 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,993 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 8 | 1968 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1979 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1969 | 15–22 | 40.5% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #138 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1970 | 29–34 | 46.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1981 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #98 | 1,750 | 0 | 8 | 1971 | 14–27 | 34.1% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,654 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 14–26 | 35.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,640 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 16–32 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,602 | 0 | 8 | 1974 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #132 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #152 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–17 | 5.6% | #192 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #332 | 1,371 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,348 | 0 | 0 |