H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Dick Stockton vs Mark Cox H2H: 4-1
Dick Stockton holds a 4–1 lead over Mark Cox in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Dick Stockton leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dick Stockton won the 1976 Columbus Wct fourth round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 1976* | Columbus Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Dick Stockton | 6-4 6-0 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1975* | Washington Indoor Wct | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Mark Cox | 6-2 7-6(5) | Dick Stockton | Match data |
| Feb 22, 1975* | Fort Worth Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Dick Stockton | 6-3 6-4 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1973* | Hilton Head | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Dick Stockton | 7-6 5-7 7-6 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Sep 5, 1972* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Dick Stockton | 6-7 6-2 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Mark Cox | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Stockton | #808 | #8 | 0 | 2,122 | 386 | 267 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dick Stockton | Mark Cox | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,917 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1976 | 58–26 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1977 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,993 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1978 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 8 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1979 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #138 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1981 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #98 | 1,750 | 0 | 8 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,654 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,640 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,602 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 |