H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dick Stockton vs Pat Cramer H2H: 3-0
Dick Stockton holds a 3–0 lead over Pat Cramer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dick Stockton leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dick Stockton won the 1977 Boston second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1977* | Boston | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Dick Stockton | 6-3 6-3 | Pat Cramer | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1976* | Louisville | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Dick Stockton | 6-2 6-2 | Pat Cramer | Match data |
| Jul 27, 1972* | Columbus | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Dick Stockton | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Pat Cramer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Stockton | #808 | #8 | 0 | 2,122 | 386 | 267 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Pat Cramer | #389 | #95 | 0 | 1,668 | 62 | 103 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dick Stockton | Pat Cramer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,917 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 58–26 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1977 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,993 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1978 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 8 | 1974 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #160 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1979 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #138 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 2–20 | 9.1% | #191 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1981 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #98 | 1,750 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,654 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,640 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #389 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,602 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |