H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Dick Stockton vs Ramesh Krishnan H2H: 0-2
Ramesh Krishnan holds a 2–0 lead over Dick Stockton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ramesh Krishnan leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ramesh Krishnan won the 1982 Bangkok fourth round 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
IND
Age 65
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 1982* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ramesh Krishnan | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Dick Stockton | Match data |
| Nov 22, 1980* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Ramesh Krishnan | 6-1 6-4 | Dick Stockton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Stockton | #808 | #8 | 0 | 2,124 | 386 | 267 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Ramesh Krishnan | — | — | — | 1,892 | 278 | 249 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dick Stockton | Ramesh Krishnan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1968 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1969 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1970 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 14–11 | 56.0% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1971 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1972 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1973 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1974 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,913 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1975 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1976 | 58–26 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,845 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1977 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,984 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1978 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1979 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #55 | 1,761 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 21–17 | 55.3% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #138 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 1981 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #98 | 1,750 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,655 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,603 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |