H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Dick Stockton vs Ricardo Cano H2H: 1-0
Dick Stockton holds a 1–0 lead over Ricardo Cano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dick Stockton leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dick Stockton won the 1977 Palm Springs second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1977* | Palm Springs | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Dick Stockton | 6-3 6-1 | Ricardo Cano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Stockton | #808 | #8 | 0 | 2,122 | 386 | 267 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Ricardo Cano | #768 | #41 | 0 | 1,792 | 142 | 147 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dick Stockton | Ricardo Cano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1971 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1972 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,917 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 58–26 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #51 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1977 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,993 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1978 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1979 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #169 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #138 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #73 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1981 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #98 | 1,750 | 0 | 8 | 1981 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #62 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,654 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #91 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,640 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,602 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |