H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Dick Stockton vs Tim Gullikson H2H: 1-3

Tim Gullikson holds a 3–1 lead over Dick Stockton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tim Gullikson leads 2–0 on carpet, while Dick Stockton leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Gullikson won the 1980 Taipei round of 32 6-7 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dick Stockton
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Tim Gullikson
USA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Gullikson 6-7 6-4 7-6 Dick Stockton Match data Nov 13, 1980* R32 Taipei ATP 250 Carpet
Tim Gullikson 7-6 6-2 Dick Stockton Match data Nov 6, 1980* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard
Tim Gullikson 3-6 7-6 6-4 Dick Stockton #8 Match data Jan 25, 1978* R64 Philadelphia Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Dick Stockton #26 6-4 7-6 Tim Gullikson Match data Jun 18, 1976* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dick Stockton #808 #8 0 2,128 386 267 59.1% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Tim Gullikson — — — 2,012 — — — 0 0 0 0 4 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dick Stockton Tim Gullikson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 2–4 33.3% — 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1969 4–9 30.8% — 1,457 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1970 8–9 47.1% — 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1971 13–9 59.1% — 1,688 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1972 26–20 56.5% — 1,786 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1973 38–24 61.3% #27 1,812 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1974 42–20 67.7% #15 1,909 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1975 39–21 65.0% #30 1,842 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1976 58–26 69.0% #15 1,998 0 4 — — — — — — —
26 1977 56–23 70.9% #10 1,985 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 1978 46–27 63.0% #19 1,925 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1979 20–21 48.8% #55 1,761 0 8 — — — — — — —
29 1980 11–16 40.7% #138 1,702 0 8 — — — — — — —
30 1981 14–15 48.3% #98 1,746 0 8 — — — — — — —
31 1982 8–18 30.8% #85 1,647 0 8 — — — — — — —
32 1983 1–2 33.3% #184 1,633 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 1984 0–3 0.0% #609 1,597 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dick Stockton Tim Gullikson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1968 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1971 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1972 9 6 15 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1973 7 6 13 53.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 17 8 25 68.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1974 13 10 23 56.5% 16 3 19 84.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1975 13 5 18 72.2% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 18 10 28 64.3% 1976 6 6 12 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1976 8 6 14 57.1% 27 9 36 75.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 15 8 23 65.2% 1977 12 5 17 70.6% 10 9 19 52.6% 18 3 21 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
26 1977 5 5 10 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 25 8 33 75.8% 1978 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
27 1978 8 6 14 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 26 13 39 66.7% 1979 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
28 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1980 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
29 1980 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 8 14 42.9%
30 1981 6 7 13 46.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 11 14 21.4%
31 1982 0 6 6 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1983 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1983 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7%
33 1984 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 89 82 171 52.0% 113 60 173 65.3% 56 42 98 57.1% 128 83 211 60.7% — 95 70 165 57.6% 29 32 61 47.5% 54 33 87 62.1% 64 62 126 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dick Stockton Tim Gullikson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1476 95.8 — — — — — — +22 36.8% -0.63 — — — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1457 106.9 — — — — +64 +76 +9 32.3% -0.81 2–2 (50%) — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 1558 123.8 — — — — +25 +31 -100 47.5% +0.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1971 1688 122.8 — — — — +8 -69 — 55.0% +0.53 6–3 (67%) 10–8 (56%) 106.4 +0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1972 1786 124.8 — — — — +5 -138 -132 53.0% +0.32 11–5 (69%) 9–13 (41%) 101.9 +2.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1973 1812 139.8 — — — — -28 -37 -155 58.9% +0.53 9–11 (45%) 17–10 (63%) 103.5 +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1974 1909 143.5 — — — — -125 +20 -99 62.9% +0.95 14–11 (56%) 11–13 (46%) 100.8 -0.92 1975 1526 110.0 — — — — +36 — — 37.5% -1.38 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.56
24 1975 1842 148.8 — — — — +38 +42 — 60.7% +0.74 14–9 (61%) 13–9 (59%) 104.1 -1.04 1976 1587 121.0 — — — — -10 -24 -68 42.9% -0.56 2–6 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.4 +0.27
25 1976 1999 161.0 — — — — -36 0 -73 67.0% +1.09 12–12 (50%) 18–7 (72%) 104.3 -5.32 1977 1869 146.4 — — — — -101 -197 0 62.5% +0.89 15–7 (68%) 6–5 (55%) 112.6 +0.69
26 1977 1986 161.9 — — — — +77 +11 -45 64.7% +0.89 16–12 (57%) 16–12 (57%) 99.3 -4.40 1978 1956 150.8 — — — — +44 -254 -114 58.9% +0.42 9–5 (64%) 15–10 (60%) 108.5 -1.31
27 1978 1926 157.1 — — — — +53 +59 — 62.1% +0.84 12–15 (44%) 14–8 (64%) 91.1 -1.12 1979 1983 152.5 — — — — +53 -246 -92 58.0% +0.51 14–2 (88%) 12–6 (67%) 111.6 -2.02
28 1979 1761 144.3 — — — — +102 +144 +80 48.5% -0.12 6–5 (55%) 11–7 (61%) 101.4 -1.76 1980 1880 148.3 — — — — +25 — +22 56.7% +0.43 8–9 (47%) 10–11 (48%) 94.1 -3.86
29 1980 1702 136.8 — — — — +7 +154 +200 42.6% -0.24 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 94.9 -1.63 1981 1868 150.9 — — — — +30 -139 -33 55.2% +0.51 9–6 (60%) 9–12 (43%) 98.3 -4.50
30 1981 1746 143.6 — — — — 0 +94 +97 50.7% +0.21 2–6 (25%) 6–6 (50%) 93.8 -1.08 1982 1729 145.3 — — — — +53 — +39 41.8% -0.47 7–8 (47%) 7–14 (33%) 92.5 -3.75
31 1982 1647 136.4 — — — — +16 +132 +143 33.9% -1.06 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) 93.1 -2.04 1983 1759 134.2 — — — — +16 -67 +54 54.9% +0.15 6–8 (43%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +0.12
32 1983 1634 106.4 — — — — -4 — — 28.6% -0.29 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.22 1984 1613 132.9 — — — — +12 +73 +194 41.2% -0.58 5–8 (38%) 9–6 (60%) 97.8 -1.08
33 1984 1597 101.7 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.44 1985 1585 121.6 — — — — +9 — +164 43.5% -0.26 2–4 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 94.1 +0.41
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1583 108.2 — — — — -10 — — 22.2% -1.89 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.44
Career — 2128 152.0 — — — — +14 +23 -21 56.9% +0.51 113–106 (52%) 134–117 (53%) 98.7 -2.49 — 2013 149.8 — — — — +23 -151 +14 53.2% +0.20 79–65 (55%) 83–78 (52%) 102.3 -3.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.