H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dick Stockton vs Tom Okker H2H: 2-1
Dick Stockton holds a 2–1 lead over Tom Okker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Dick Stockton leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1977 Charlotte Wct fourth round 3-6 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1977* | Charlotte Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tom Okker | 3-6 6-1 6-1 | Dick Stockton | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1977* | Toronto Indoor Wct | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Dick Stockton | 6-4 6-2 | Tom Okker | Match data |
| Feb 22, 1976* | Rome Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Dick Stockton | 6-3 6-2 | Tom Okker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Stockton | #808 | #8 | 0 | 2,122 | 386 | 267 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Tom Okker | #438 | #3 | 0 | 2,198 | 672 | 279 | 70.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 37 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dick Stockton | Tom Okker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,917 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1976 | 58–26 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1977 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,993 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | 1978 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 8 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 |
| 28 | 1979 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 |
| 29 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #138 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 |
| 30 | 1981 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #98 | 1,750 | 0 | 8 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 |
| 31 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,654 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 |
| 32 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,640 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 |
| 33 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,602 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 |