H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dick Stockton vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 0-1
Vladimir Zednik holds a 1–0 lead over Dick Stockton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vladimir Zednik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Vladimir Zednik won the 1977 Tokyo Outdoor second round 7-5 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1977* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Vladimir Zednik | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Dick Stockton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Stockton | #808 | #8 | 0 | 2,122 | 386 | 267 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dick Stockton | Vladimir Zednik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,917 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 58–26 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1977 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,993 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1978 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 8 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1979 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #138 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1981 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #98 | 1,750 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,654 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,640 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,602 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |