H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Diego Hartfield vs Tomas Zib H2H: 0-1
Tomas Zib holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Hartfield in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 2007 Wimbledon first round 4-6 7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 45
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Tomas Zib | 4-6 7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Diego Hartfield | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Hartfield | #949 | #73 | 523 | 1,661 | 18 | 29 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Hartfield | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #89 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #169 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |