H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Diego Junqueira vs Paul Capdeville H2H: 2-0
Diego Junqueira holds a 2–0 lead over Paul Capdeville in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Diego Junqueira leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Diego Junqueira won the 2009 Roland Garros first round 3-6 7-5 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 45
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 43
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Diego Junqueira | 3-6 7-5 6-1 6-3 | Paul Capdeville | Match data |
| May 20, 2009* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Diego Junqueira | 6-3 6-2 | Paul Capdeville | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Junqueira | #1,357 | #68 | 1,094 | 1,656 | 11 | 33 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paul Capdeville | #1,186 | #76 | 960 | 1,730 | 36 | 67 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Junqueira | Paul Capdeville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #149 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #111 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #78 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #193 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #166 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #123 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #279 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |