H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Diego Nargiso vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 0-1

Andrei Olhovskiy holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrei Olhovskiy won the 1992 Taipei quarterfinal 7-6(9) 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Andrei Olhovskiy
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrei Olhovskiy #101 7-6(9) 4-6 6-4 Diego Nargiso #96 Match data Oct 24, 1992* QF Taipei ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andrei Olhovskiy #1,310 #49 690 1,731 116 163 41.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Diego Nargiso Andrei Olhovskiy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0 1987 0–2 0.0% #232 1,470 0 0
22 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0 1988 6–8 42.9% #86 1,519 0 0
23 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0 1989 4–10 28.6% #302 1,509 0 0
24 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0 1990 4–4 50.0% #148 1,567 0 0
25 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0 1991 4–10 28.6% #136 1,513 0 0
26 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0 1992 16–18 47.1% #80 1,639 0 0
27 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0 1993 26–29 47.3% #65 1,662 0 1
28 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0 1994 23–27 46.0% #97 1,671 0 1
29 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0 1995 12–21 36.4% #118 1,586 0 1
30 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0 1996 21–19 52.5% #90 1,695 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1997 0–14 0.0% #442 1,492 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #1256 1,481 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Diego Nargiso Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1989 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1990 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
25 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1991 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 5 7 12 41.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 5 12 17 29.4% 4 9 13 30.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 5 18 72.2%
28 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 7 10 17 41.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
29 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — 1996 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8% — 30 61 91 33.0% 16 36 52 30.8% 23 23 46 50.0% 47 43 90 52.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 164/181 of Diego Nargiso's and 209/241 of Andrei Olhovskiy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Diego Nargiso Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1991 22/23 6.7 5.4 55.7% 74.1% 51.5% 62.6% 37.2% 63.8% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 38/41 6.9 4.9 53.9% 75.4% 48.2% 63.7% 48.5% 62.7% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 27/31 6.1 4.0 54.0% 72.0% 45.3% 55.7% 36.1% 59.7% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1994 27/28 5.6 5.5 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 51.7% 46.5% 57.6% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1995 13/15 6.8 6.1 50.9% 72.5% 46.3% 53.1% 49.4% 59.5% 36.3% 1991 11/14 4.6 4.6 54.5% 68.7% 43.3% 45.8% 38.1% 57.2% 34.9%
26 1996 9/10 5.1 7.7 54.5% 68.2% 39.5% 61.9% 36.7% 54.8% 36.1% 1992 34/34 5.6 4.1 54.4% 74.1% 50.1% 54.5% 38.5% 63.1% 37.8%
27 1997 4/5 4.8 3.3 54.8% 72.6% 44.6% 72.0% 22.2% 59.9% 29.6% 1993 45/55 6.8 3.3 57.9% 74.4% 48.4% 56.1% 34.0% 63.4% 37.0%
28 1998 9/10 5.6 3.1 54.8% 73.0% 49.4% 43.9% 47.4% 62.7% 38.4% 1994 46/50 9.6 5.1 55.7% 75.3% 48.5% 53.6% 44.2% 63.5% 35.8%
29 1999 5/6 4.6 3.0 58.5% 63.4% 43.0% 64.9% 31.7% 54.6% 30.8% 1995 30/33 8.2 3.7 56.8% 73.7% 48.4% 57.7% 29.0% 62.8% 35.3%
30 2000 10/12 6.5 4.0 55.1% 79.1% 48.5% 44.7% 51.7% 65.2% 38.7% 1996 30/40 8.3 4.8 56.3% 75.4% 47.6% 63.7% 38.3% 63.3% 34.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 12/14 10.7 5.5 52.7% 70.8% 45.8% 60.2% 31.0% 59.0% 32.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 3.0 1.0 67.8% 62.5% 57.9% 0.0% 100.0% 61.0% 34.2%
Career — 164/248 6.2 4.9 53.7% 72.7% 46.9% 57.3% 43.0% 60.7% 36.4% — 209/279 7.7 4.3 56.0% 74.0% 48.2% 56.0% 37.2% 62.7% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Diego Nargiso Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.69 1987 1471 102.0 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.07
22 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) — +2.22 1988 1519 108.6 — — — — -34 — +107 45.7% -0.66 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +1.54
23 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) — -0.26 1989 1509 111.6 — — — — -2 -18 — 33.3% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.23
24 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.26 1990 1568 127.2 — — — — +6 — — 55.0% +0.45 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.41
25 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.11 1991 1513 111.9 -2.55 -1.87 0.815 46.2% -30 — +200 32.5% -0.95 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.66
26 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.08 1992 1639 134.2 +1.24 +0.43 1.025 50.2% -51 -113 +131 49.4% -0.09 4–7 (36%) 12–7 (63%) — -0.10
27 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59 1993 1662 134.3 +1.97 -1.09 1.010 49.5% +17 -124 +94 48.1% -0.26 9–10 (47%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.58
28 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18 1994 1672 128.7 +1.65 -1.73 0.981 49.6% +4 -106 +40 47.0% -0.23 11–12 (48%) 7–16 (30%) — +1.82
29 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00 1995 1587 124.1 +0.08 -2.77 0.951 49.1% +39 -62 +77 41.3% -0.43 2–3 (40%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.70
30 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.50 1996 1696 125.1 +0.74 -2.13 0.940 49.1% -13 -175 -15 50.5% +0.12 10–8 (56%) 11–14 (44%) — +1.43
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1493 110.3 -2.20 -3.61 0.788 45.9% +37 — — 19.4% -1.58 0–7 (0%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1482 100.8 -0.17 -0.96 0.878 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.07
Career — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29 — 1732 130.9 +0.85 -1.56 0.961 49.1% +1 -104 +85 44.1% -0.36 44–57 (44%) 57–74 (44%) 98.2 +2.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.