H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Diego Nargiso vs Chris Pridham H2H: 2-0

Diego Nargiso holds a 2–0 lead over Chris Pridham in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Diego Nargiso leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Nargiso won the 1992 Taipei round of 32 6-3 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Chris Pridham
CAN Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Diego Nargiso #96 6-3 7-6(6) Chris Pridham #113 Match data Oct 22, 1992* R32 Taipei ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Diego Nargiso #96 7-5 7-6 7-6 Chris Pridham #97 Match data Aug 31, 1988* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chris Pridham #1,219 #75 433 1,650 51 75 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Diego Nargiso Chris Pridham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% #248 1,481 0 0
21 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% #263 1,471 0 0
22 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #114 1,483 0 0
23 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0 1988 13–16 44.8% #137 1,526 0 0
24 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0 1989 7–11 38.9% #146 1,553 0 0
25 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0 1990 2–7 22.2% #155 1,488 0 0
26 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0 1991 3–5 37.5% #132 1,492 0 0
27 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0 1992 14–16 46.7% #131 1,578 0 0
28 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0 1993 11–15 42.3% #145 1,587 0 0
29 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #1219 1,566 0 0
30 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Diego Nargiso Chris Pridham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1988 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1989 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8% — 36 49 85 42.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 8 13 21 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 164/181 of Diego Nargiso's and 61/65 of Chris Pridham's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Diego Nargiso Chris Pridham
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1991 22/23 6.7 5.4 55.7% 74.1% 51.5% 62.6% 37.2% 63.8% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 38/41 6.9 4.9 53.9% 75.4% 48.2% 63.7% 48.5% 62.7% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 27/31 6.1 4.0 54.0% 72.0% 45.3% 55.7% 36.1% 59.7% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1994 27/28 5.6 5.5 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 51.7% 46.5% 57.6% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1995 13/15 6.8 6.1 50.9% 72.5% 46.3% 53.1% 49.4% 59.5% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1996 9/10 5.1 7.7 54.5% 68.2% 39.5% 61.9% 36.7% 54.8% 36.1% 1991 7/8 3.1 3.1 59.3% 72.8% 51.4% 71.7% 35.7% 64.0% 33.5%
27 1997 4/5 4.8 3.3 54.8% 72.6% 44.6% 72.0% 22.2% 59.9% 29.6% 1992 27/30 2.9 3.3 60.5% 69.9% 49.8% 59.5% 30.2% 61.9% 35.7%
28 1998 9/10 5.6 3.1 54.8% 73.0% 49.4% 43.9% 47.4% 62.7% 38.4% 1993 26/26 3.9 2.8 57.1% 69.6% 53.6% 59.0% 30.2% 62.8% 35.5%
29 1999 5/6 4.6 3.0 58.5% 63.4% 43.0% 64.9% 31.7% 54.6% 30.8% 1994 1/1 2.0 5.0 54.8% 67.6% 46.4% 57.1% 50.0% 58.1% 29.1%
30 2000 10/12 6.5 4.0 55.1% 79.1% 48.5% 44.7% 51.7% 65.2% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164/248 6.2 4.9 53.7% 72.7% 46.9% 57.3% 43.0% 60.7% 36.4% — 61/126 3.3 3.1 58.8% 70.0% 51.6% 60.6% 31.2% 62.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Diego Nargiso Chris Pridham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55 1985 1482 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.34
21 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.69 1986 1472 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.03
22 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) — +2.22 1987 1484 114.7 — — — — +31 — — 28.6% -0.71 1–0 0–1 — 0.00
23 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) — -0.26 1988 1527 113.0 — — — — -2 — +65 43.0% -0.51 5–3 (63%) 5–9 (36%) — +1.74
24 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.26 1989 1553 117.5 — — — — +10 — +31 38.8% -0.55 4–3 (57%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.55
25 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.11 1990 1489 104.8 — — — — +21 — — 36.4% -0.82 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.95
26 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.08 1991 1493 107.7 +0.73 -1.59 0.929 49.5% +26 — — 38.9% -0.28 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.81
27 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59 1992 1579 126.9 -0.38 -2.42 0.936 48.9% +35 — -20 45.1% -0.18 8–5 (62%) 6–10 (38%) — +1.59
28 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18 1993 1587 128.0 +0.43 -1.47 0.953 49.3% +22 — — 46.9% -0.33 2–6 (25%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.79
29 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00 1994 1566 97.9 -2.87 +0.77 0.694 44.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.25
30 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29 — 1650 123.5 +0.05 -1.87 0.938 49.1% +19 — +37 41.9% -0.45 22–21 (51%) 23–39 (37%) 97.1 +5.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.