H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Diego Nargiso vs Fernando Luna H2H: 1-0

Diego Nargiso holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Luna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diego Nargiso leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Diego Nargiso won the 1989 Monte-Carlo Masters round of 64 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Fernando Luna
ESP Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Diego Nargiso #116 6-4 7-6 Fernando Luna #77 Match data Apr 26, 1989* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fernando Luna #723 #33 310 1,779 167 160 51.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Diego Nargiso Fernando Luna
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0 1977 1–1 50.0% #322 1,511 0 0
20 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0 1978 2–2 50.0% #340 1,541 0 0
21 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0 1979 5–9 35.7% #87 1,517 0 0
22 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0 1980 18–13 58.1% #66 1,708 0 0
23 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0 1981 17–15 53.1% #81 1,694 0 0
24 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0 1982 23–18 56.1% #60 1,724 0 0
25 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0 1983 19–13 59.4% #53 1,733 0 0
26 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0 1984 12–14 46.2% #70 1,646 0 0
27 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0 1985 10–14 41.7% #111 1,620 0 0
28 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0 1986 19–14 57.6% #52 1,690 0 0
29 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0 1987 4–6 40.0% #261 1,644 0 0
30 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0 1988 18–12 60.0% #59 1,705 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 1989 11–16 40.7% #135 1,566 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1990 8–10 44.4% #110 1,588 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1991 0–3 0.0% #356 1,535 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Diego Nargiso Fernando Luna
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1978 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 — — — — 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
22 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1980 — — — — 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — — — — —
23 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1981 — — — — 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — — — —
24 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1982 — — — — 23 18 41 56.1% — — — — — — — —
25 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1983 — — — — 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — — — — —
26 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 — — — — 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — — — — —
27 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1985 — — — — 10 14 24 41.7% — — — — — — — —
28 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 — — — — 19 14 33 57.6% — — — — — — — —
29 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 18 11 29 62.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8% — 0 1 1 0.0% 167 157 324 51.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Diego Nargiso Fernando Luna
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) 106.6 +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 100.5 -1.78 1977 1512 110.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — — — +0.06
20 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55 1978 1541 122.3 — — — — — +41 — 60.0% +1.10 0–2 — — -0.24
21 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) 95.1 -0.69 1979 1517 119.6 — — — — — +31 — 43.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 95.7 +1.17
22 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) 94.6 +2.22 1980 1708 148.6 — — — — — +22 — 54.3% +0.33 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 104.7 -1.05
23 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) 94.7 -0.26 1981 1695 133.6 — — — — — +19 — 49.4% +0.10 10–6 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 98.7 +1.18
24 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 101.5 +0.26 1982 1725 145.1 — — — — — +18 — 52.7% +0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.9 -0.88
25 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 +0.11 1983 1733 134.9 — — — — — +26 — 57.7% +0.86 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +2.65
26 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 -0.08 1984 1647 140.1 — — — — — +41 — 47.5% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -0.03
27 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59 1985 1620 133.2 — — — — — +19 — 42.4% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 99.2 -1.21
28 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18 1986 1691 141.4 — — — — — +38 — 57.5% +0.71 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 98.6 +0.24
29 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00 1987 1644 114.7 — — — — — +31 — 40.0% -1.10 — 1–0 — -0.15
30 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.9 +0.50 1988 1706 136.6 — — — — — +48 — 58.7% +0.56 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.63
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1566 117.8 — — — — — +22 — 46.0% -0.14 2–5 (29%) 6–4 (60%) 96.1 +0.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1588 130.6 — — — — — +37 — 43.9% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1536 93.3 -2.58 +0.12 0.731 42.6% — — — 12.5% -2.88 0–1 1–1 — +0.23
Career — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29 — 1779 144.3 -2.58 +0.12 0.731 42.6% — +29 — 50.7% +0.24 44–43 (51%) 32–47 (41%) 93.6 +0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.