H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Diego Nargiso vs Jan Gunnarsson H2H: 1-1
Diego Nargiso and Jan Gunnarsson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Diego Nargiso leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jan Gunnarsson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Diego Nargiso won the 1992 Copenhagen third round 6-1 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 64
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 1992* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Diego Nargiso | 6-1 7-6(2) | Jan Gunnarsson | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jan Gunnarsson | 3-6 6-3 6-7 6-3 6-4 | Diego Nargiso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan Gunnarsson | #774 | #25 | 579 | 1,822 | 190 | 203 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Nargiso | Jan Gunnarsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #389 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #274 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #39 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #94 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #296 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #511 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |