H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Diego Nargiso vs Jeremy Bates H2H: 1-0

Diego Nargiso holds a 1–0 lead over Jeremy Bates in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diego Nargiso leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Nargiso won the 1988 Rye Brook quarterfinal 6-3 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jeremy Bates
GBR Age 64 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Diego Nargiso #137 6-3 2-6 6-3 Jeremy Bates #92 Match data Aug 27, 1988* QF Rye Brook ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jeremy Bates #1,314 #54 700 1,717 117 175 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Diego Nargiso Jeremy Bates
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% #372 1,482 0 0
19 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,494 0 0
20 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,470 0 0
21 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0 1983 1–4 20.0% #329 1,466 0 0
22 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0 1984 0–6 0.0% #185 1,397 0 0
23 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0 1985 9–11 45.0% #99 1,479 0 0
24 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0 1986 9–16 36.0% #187 1,513 0 0
25 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0 1987 12–10 54.5% #89 1,644 0 0
26 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0 1988 15–19 44.1% #152 1,622 0 0
27 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0 1989 13–12 52.0% #96 1,659 0 0
28 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0 1990 6–18 25.0% #126 1,529 0 0
29 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0 1991 4–5 44.4% #168 1,571 0 0
30 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0 1992 7–12 36.8% #105 1,582 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 1993 12–17 41.4% #98 1,595 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1994 16–16 50.0% #77 1,618 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1995 12–22 35.3% #143 1,522 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1996 0–3 0.0% #600 1,485 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Diego Nargiso Jeremy Bates
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1981 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
23 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 8 12 20 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 9 9 18 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — 1992 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 2 6 8 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 11 17 35.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8% — 58 80 138 42.0% 8 21 29 27.6% 34 44 78 43.6% 17 30 47 36.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 164/181 of Diego Nargiso's and 106/126 of Jeremy Bates's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Diego Nargiso Jeremy Bates
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1991 22/23 6.7 5.4 55.7% 74.1% 51.5% 62.6% 37.2% 63.8% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 38/41 6.9 4.9 53.9% 75.4% 48.2% 63.7% 48.5% 62.7% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 27/31 6.1 4.0 54.0% 72.0% 45.3% 55.7% 36.1% 59.7% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1994 27/28 5.6 5.5 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 51.7% 46.5% 57.6% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1995 13/15 6.8 6.1 50.9% 72.5% 46.3% 53.1% 49.4% 59.5% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1996 9/10 5.1 7.7 54.5% 68.2% 39.5% 61.9% 36.7% 54.8% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1997 4/5 4.8 3.3 54.8% 72.6% 44.6% 72.0% 22.2% 59.9% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1998 9/10 5.6 3.1 54.8% 73.0% 49.4% 43.9% 47.4% 62.7% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1999 5/6 4.6 3.0 58.5% 63.4% 43.0% 64.9% 31.7% 54.6% 30.8% 1991 7/9 3.1 3.3 61.5% 69.8% 53.1% 62.7% 33.5% 63.1% 35.3%
30 2000 10/12 6.5 4.0 55.1% 79.1% 48.5% 44.7% 51.7% 65.2% 38.7% 1992 17/19 3.9 3.8 60.0% 69.8% 42.1% 60.1% 47.3% 58.6% 35.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 24/29 2.0 2.9 53.4% 64.7% 48.5% 50.3% 44.1% 57.3% 37.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 26/32 4.0 4.7 52.9% 73.0% 48.2% 63.0% 46.0% 61.3% 34.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 30/34 3.8 4.2 53.1% 68.6% 44.8% 45.6% 39.7% 57.2% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 2/3 4.5 5.5 57.5% 66.0% 46.0% 61.1% 14.3% 57.6% 32.1%
Career — 164/248 6.2 4.9 53.7% 72.7% 46.9% 57.3% 43.0% 60.7% 36.4% — 106/292 3.4 3.9 54.9% 69.0% 46.6% 54.7% 42.6% 58.9% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Diego Nargiso Jeremy Bates
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) — +0.18 1980 1482 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.25
19 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.78 1981 1495 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.12
20 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55 1982 1470 96.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.69 1983 1467 110.8 — — — — — — — 18.2% -1.91 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.21
22 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) — +2.22 1984 1398 90.5 — — — — — — +36 13.3% -2.33 0–2 1–1 — +0.70
23 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) — -0.26 1985 1480 114.0 — — — — +93 — -61 46.8% -0.26 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.57
24 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.26 1986 1514 122.4 — — — — +60 -52 -37 44.6% -0.57 2–8 (20%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.61
25 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.11 1987 1645 121.6 — — — — -16 — -76 51.7% +0.21 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.46
26 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.08 1988 1623 121.3 — — — — -11 -108 -55 41.7% -0.74 10–5 (67%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.50
27 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59 1989 1659 123.3 — — — — -14 -100 -69 52.3% -0.03 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.18
28 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18 1990 1529 118.0 — — — — +33 — +70 33.9% -0.97 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.28
29 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00 1991 1572 117.8 +0.31 +0.02 0.958 49.0% -15 — +54 45.8% -0.50 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.30
30 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.50 1992 1582 113.5 -1.79 -1.18 0.850 47.0% -68 — +93 43.8% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.12
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1595 125.5 -2.87 +0.17 0.884 47.4% -23 — +86 38.8% -0.60 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.79
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1618 127.5 -0.88 -2.29 0.893 48.2% -29 — +141 52.4% -0.13 5–7 (42%) 7–5 (58%) — +1.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1523 122.8 -4.22 -1.39 0.847 46.5% +33 — +186 33.3% -1.05 5–2 (71%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.42
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1485 94.4 -1.81 -0.66 0.757 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.04
Career — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29 — 1718 125.6 -2.36 -1.12 0.872 47.3% +3 -78 +30 42.1% -0.60 42–45 (48%) 53–55 (49%) 104.9 +2.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.