H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
D. Nargiso vs K. Evernden H2H: 1-0
D. Nargiso holds a 1–0 lead over K. Evernden in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, D. Nargiso leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, D. Nargiso won the 1991 Charlotte third round 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 64
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 1991* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | D. Nargiso | 6-2 7-6(3) | K. Evernden | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| K. Evernden | #1,218 | #31 | 535 | 1,853 | 121 | 129 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | D. Nargiso | K. Evernden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #403 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #576 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #86 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #289 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #36 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #119 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #97 | 1,615 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #193 | 1,512 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #207 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,580 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,570 | 0 | 3 |