Diego Nargiso
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 15, 1996 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 21, 1993 | H2H |
| Mark Woodforde | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 14, 1992 | H2H |
| Sergi Bruguera | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 30, 2000 | H2H |
| Jan Siemerink | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 13, 1998 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Diego Nargiso holds a 1–0 lead over Libor Pimek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diego Nargiso leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Diego Nargiso won the 1987 Palermo round of 32 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Nargiso | 6-0 7-5 | Libor Pimek | Match data | Oct 1, 1987* | R32 | Palermo | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 95 | 153 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Nargiso | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Diego Nargiso | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1983 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1984 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1991 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1985 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1992 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1986 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 1993 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1987 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1994 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1988 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 25 | 1995 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 1998 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 33 | 47 | 80 | 41.2% | 30 | 64 | 94 | 31.9% | 11 | 15 | 26 | 42.3% | 21 | 27 | 48 | 43.8% | — | 35 | 33 | 68 | 51.5% | 74 | 63 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 15 | 21 | 36 | 41.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 164/181 of Diego Nargiso's and 5/6 of Libor Pimek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Diego Nargiso | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 21 | 1991 | 22/23 | 6.7 | 5.4 | 55.7% | 74.1% | 51.5% | 62.6% | 37.2% | 63.8% | 35.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 38/41 | 6.9 | 4.9 | 53.9% | 75.4% | 48.2% | 63.7% | 48.5% | 62.7% | 36.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 27/31 | 6.1 | 4.0 | 54.0% | 72.0% | 45.3% | 55.7% | 36.1% | 59.7% | 35.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1994 | 27/28 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 50.7% | 69.4% | 45.3% | 51.7% | 46.5% | 57.6% | 38.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1995 | 13/15 | 6.8 | 6.1 | 50.9% | 72.5% | 46.3% | 53.1% | 49.4% | 59.5% | 36.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 9/10 | 5.1 | 7.7 | 54.5% | 68.2% | 39.5% | 61.9% | 36.7% | 54.8% | 36.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 4/5 | 4.8 | 3.3 | 54.8% | 72.6% | 44.6% | 72.0% | 22.2% | 59.9% | 29.6% | 1991 | 4/5 | 1.5 | 6.8 | 56.9% | 67.4% | 40.7% | 39.3% | 38.9% | 55.9% | 39.8% |
| 28 | 1998 | 9/10 | 5.6 | 3.1 | 54.8% | 73.0% | 49.4% | 43.9% | 47.4% | 62.7% | 38.4% | 1992 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 54.4% | 48.4% | 42.3% | 28.6% | 33.3% | 45.6% | 35.3% |
| 29 | 1999 | 5/6 | 4.6 | 3.0 | 58.5% | 63.4% | 43.0% | 64.9% | 31.7% | 54.6% | 30.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 10/12 | 6.5 | 4.0 | 55.1% | 79.1% | 48.5% | 44.7% | 51.7% | 65.2% | 38.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 164/248 | 6.2 | 4.9 | 53.7% | 72.7% | 46.9% | 57.3% | 43.0% | 60.7% | 36.4% | — | 5/243 | 1.2 | 6.8 | 56.4% | 63.6% | 41.0% | 37.1% | 37.8% | 53.8% | 38.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Diego Nargiso | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1987 | 1511 | 117.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | 42.9% | -0.43 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 1627 | 124.8 | — | — | — | — | -27 | -80 | -33 | 46.9% | -0.81 | 2–5 (29%) | 11–1 (92%) | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 1593 | 128.6 | — | — | — | — | -51 | +6 | -10 | 40.5% | -0.61 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–7 (42%) | — | -1.78 | 1983 | 1680 | 144.4 | — | — | — | — | -76 | +43 | — | 53.7% | +0.38 | 6–4 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.95 |
| 20 | 1990 | 1621 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -33 | -6 | — | 37.5% | -0.67 | 2–0 | 3–3 (50%) | — | -0.55 | 1984 | 1766 | 147.4 | — | — | — | — | -132 | +110 | — | 58.2% | +0.51 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | -1.14 |
| 21 | 1991 | 1604 | 129.0 | +1.95 | -2.04 | 0.984 | 49.3% | -51 | +20 | +36 | 45.6% | -0.21 | 1–6 (14%) | 9–10 (47%) | — | -0.69 | 1985 | 1786 | 142.2 | — | — | — | — | -63 | +23 | — | 54.2% | +0.26 | 10–6 (63%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | -2.15 |
| 22 | 1992 | 1597 | 130.3 | +1.50 | -1.75 | 0.972 | 49.7% | +42 | -3 | +10 | 51.9% | -0.02 | 4–12 (25%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | +2.22 | 1986 | 1694 | 123.8 | — | — | — | — | -33 | +69 | — | 47.5% | -0.46 | 10–4 (71%) | 4–7 (36%) | — | +1.70 |
| 23 | 1993 | 1526 | 127.3 | -0.86 | -2.64 | 0.886 | 47.7% | +68 | +4 | — | 33.3% | -0.83 | 2–6 (25%) | 6–13 (32%) | — | -0.26 | 1987 | 1660 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | +56 | -51 | — | 43.1% | -0.79 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | +0.05 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1532 | 129.5 | -2.33 | -0.45 | 0.916 | 48.2% | +95 | -56 | +44 | 38.9% | -0.65 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | +0.26 | 1988 | 1564 | 116.7 | — | — | — | — | +89 | -31 | — | 33.3% | -1.07 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.74 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1530 | 121.5 | -1.52 | -1.31 | 0.895 | 48.0% | +72 | -44 | +59 | 38.9% | -0.47 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 1508 | 114.3 | -4.18 | -0.49 | 0.799 | 46.0% | +85 | -38 | — | 32.3% | -1.42 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 1547 | 124.6 | +0.07 | -0.53 | 0.739 | 45.4% | +84 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.75 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.59 | 1991 | 1531 | 106.0 | -0.47 | -0.21 | 0.902 | 47.9% | +81 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.45 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.28 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1564 | 120.6 | +0.37 | -0.45 | 1.029 | 50.3% | +93 | -104 | — | 50.0% | -0.33 | 0–4 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.18 | 1992 | 1518 | 97.8 | +0.55 | -1.38 | 0.649 | 40.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 |
| 29 | 1999 | 1524 | 107.2 | -1.01 | -2.74 | 0.678 | 43.7% | — | -79 | — | 23.1% | -1.54 | 0–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 1625 | 118.8 | +1.47 | -0.06 | 1.112 | 51.4% | +19 | -21 | — | 68.0% | +0.72 | 4–1 (80%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1703 | 135.7 | -0.19 | -1.44 | 0.926 | 48.6% | +29 | -23 | +20 | 42.9% | -0.51 | 30–56 (35%) | 58–60 (49%) | 97.6 | -0.29 | — | 1861 | 138.4 | -0.27 | -0.44 | 0.842 | 46.5% | -26 | +43 | — | 48.7% | -0.17 | 41–26 (61%) | 24–20 (55%) | 109.7 | -0.40 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 15, 1996 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 21, 1993 | H2H |
| Mark Woodforde | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 14, 1992 | H2H |
| Sergi Bruguera | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 30, 2000 | H2H |
| Jan Siemerink | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 13, 1998 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Thierry Tulasne | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 16, 1987 | H2H |
| Pavel Slozil | 5 | 1 | 6 | Nov 22, 1985 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 23, 1991 | H2H |