H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Diego Nargiso vs Paolo Cane H2H: 0-2
Paolo Cane holds a 2–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paolo Cane leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paolo Cane won the 1989 Vienna third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 1989* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Paolo Cane | 6-3 6-4 | Diego Nargiso | Match data |
| May 12, 1989* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Paolo Cane | 6-3 6-7 6-2 | Diego Nargiso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Nargiso | Paolo Cane | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |