H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Diego Nargiso vs Simon Youl H2H: 0-1
Simon Youl holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simon Youl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Simon Youl won the 1992 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1992* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Simon Youl | 6-1 7-5 | Diego Nargiso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Simon Youl | #1,263 | #80 | 474 | 1,704 | 91 | 140 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Nargiso | Simon Youl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #450 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #201 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #90 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #156 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #154 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #140 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #94 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #200 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,443 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |