H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
D. Nargiso vs T. Tulasne H2H: 0-1
T. Tulasne holds a 1–0 lead over D. Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, T. Tulasne leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, T. Tulasne won the 1989 Sydney Outdoor third round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1989* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | T. Tulasne | 6-4 7-6 | D. Nargiso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| T. Tulasne | #1,117 | #10 | 334 | 1,937 | 215 | 206 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | D. Nargiso | T. Tulasne | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #113 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #82 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #23 | 1,878 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #20 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #57 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #75 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #127 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #158 | 1,532 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,493 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |