H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Diego Perez vs Balazs Taroczy H2H: 0-1
Balazs Taroczy holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Perez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Balazs Taroczy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1982 Nice third round 3-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1982* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Diego Perez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Perez | Balazs Taroczy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 |