H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Diego Perez vs Cassio Motta H2H: 2-0
Diego Perez holds a 2–0 lead over Cassio Motta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Diego Perez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Diego Perez won the 1983 North Conway second round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 1983* | North Conway | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Diego Perez | 6-3 6-0 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
| May 25, 1983* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Diego Perez | 6-7 6-1 6-1 6-2 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,740 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Perez | Cassio Motta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |