H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Diego Perez vs Danie Visser H2H: 0-1

Danie Visser holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Perez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danie Visser leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1986 Swiss Indoors round of 16 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Diego Perez
URU Age 64 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Danie Visser
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Danie Visser #124 6-2 6-4 Diego Perez #59 Match data Oct 17, 1986* R16 Swiss Indoors ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Diego Perez #1,263 #27 389 1,824 195 213 47.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Diego Perez Danie Visser
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1979 0–1 0.0% #579 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1980 0–1 0.0% #211 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1981 16–15 51.6% #94 1,652 0 0 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,506 0 0
20 1982 11–16 40.7% #100 1,657 0 0 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1983 19–14 57.6% #51 1,728 0 0 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1984 15–16 48.4% #52 1,659 0 0 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1985 30–21 58.8% #55 1,763 0 1 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1986 30–25 54.5% #61 1,692 0 1 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1987 15–19 44.1% #116 1,668 0 1 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1988 12–17 41.4% #142 1,608 0 1 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1989 17–17 50.0% #112 1,651 0 1 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1990 12–18 40.0% #132 1,594 0 1 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1991 5–9 35.7% #176 1,572 0 1 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0
30 1992 11–10 52.4% #128 1,619 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1993 2–13 13.3% #253 1,511 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1994 0–1 0.0% #661 1,498 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Diego Perez Danie Visser
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 16 14 30 53.3% — — — — — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 11 15 26 42.3% — — — — — — — — 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1983 4 2 6 66.7% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1984 0 3 3 0.0% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
23 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 28 16 44 63.6% — — — — — — — — 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 22 18 40 55.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1987 7 7 14 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1988 6 8 14 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 15 13 28 53.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
28 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 11 12 23 47.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 32 49 81 39.5% 162 156 318 50.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% — 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 44/51 of Diego Perez's and 3/3 of Danie Visser's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Diego Perez Danie Visser
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
29 1991 10/14 2.5 1.6 68.2% 64.4% 54.5% 54.3% 44.9% 61.3% 42.0% 1991 3/3 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%
30 1992 20/21 3.0 2.4 60.0% 63.8% 50.4% 52.5% 45.3% 58.6% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 13/15 1.8 3.7 58.0% 60.3% 44.7% 49.0% 31.2% 53.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 1/1 0.0 3.0 63.0% 47.1% 43.3% 60.0% 28.6% 45.7% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 44/408 2.5 2.6 61.4% 62.5% 49.5% 52.0% 40.7% 57.3% 41.3% — 3/221 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Diego Perez Danie Visser
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1979 1486 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1980 1473 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1981 1652 145.1 — — — — — +48 — 56.3% +0.03 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.45 1981 1507 107.7 — — — — +43 — — 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 — +0.01
20 1982 1658 141.1 — — — — — +31 — 47.8% -0.18 4–9 (31%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.92 1982 1483 114.0 — — — — +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.20
21 1983 1728 141.3 — — — — -150 +8 — 54.1% +0.43 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.26 1983 1496 111.4 — — — — +39 -38 — 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.59
22 1984 1659 138.8 — — — — -149 +78 — 52.0% +0.03 2–8 (20%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.21 1984 1618 134.7 — — — — -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.82
23 1985 1763 138.5 — — — — -270 +48 — 53.9% +0.37 9–2 (82%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.70 1985 1643 120.9 — — — — -82 — +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.53
24 1986 1693 137.4 — — — — -108 +6 — 51.6% +0.21 9–7 (56%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.43 1986 1676 124.7 — — — — -64 — +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.55
25 1987 1669 132.4 — — — — -52 -12 — 44.7% -0.31 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) — -2.18 1987 1635 124.7 — — — — -10 — +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.15
26 1988 1609 125.1 — — — — -4 0 — 45.3% -0.41 8–9 (47%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.14 1988 1591 112.9 — — — — -2 — +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.16
27 1989 1651 135.0 — — — — -57 +26 — 50.0% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.06 1989 1621 129.7 — — — — -23 — +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.79
28 1990 1594 127.7 — — — — -38 +95 — 42.3% -0.83 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.79 1990 1652 113.0 — — — — -22 — -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.54
29 1991 1573 118.5 -0.06 +0.92 1.086 51.0% -20 +66 — 41.7% -0.36 0–3 (0%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.11 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 1992 1619 123.6 -1.94 +2.72 1.058 51.0% -104 +109 — 50.9% +0.25 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 1511 108.3 -3.89 -1.43 0.785 45.0% -47 +102 — 29.3% -1.93 0–6 (0%) 2–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 1498 98.3 +1.21 -2.79 0.789 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1825 141.5 -2.02 +0.96 0.967 49.1% -84 +41 — 48.7% -0.11 58–74 (44%) 41–56 (42%) 92.5 -1.03 — 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.