H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Diego Perez vs David Pate H2H: 1-1

Diego Perez and David Pate are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Diego Perez leads 1–0 on clay, while David Pate leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Perez won the 1988 Charleston third round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Diego Perez
URU Age 64 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
David Pate
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 28, 1988* Charleston ATP 250 R32 Clay Diego Perez #144 6-3 6-1 David Pate #24 Match data
Feb 15, 1984* La Quinta ATP 250 R64 Hard David Pate #130 6-3 6-4 Diego Perez #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Diego Perez #1,373 #27 389 1,830 195 213 47.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,874 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Diego Perez David Pate
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1979 0–1 0.0% #579 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1980 0–1 0.0% #211 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1981 16–15 51.6% #94 1,652 0 0 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1982 11–16 40.7% #100 1,657 0 0 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,484 0 0
21 1983 19–14 57.6% #51 1,728 0 0 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0
22 1984 15–16 48.4% #52 1,658 0 0 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1
23 1985 30–21 58.8% #55 1,779 0 1 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,741 0 1
24 1986 30–25 54.5% #61 1,694 0 1 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,787 0 1
25 1987 15–19 44.1% #116 1,668 0 1 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,751 0 2
26 1988 12–17 41.4% #142 1,607 0 1 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,716 0 2
27 1989 17–17 50.0% #112 1,650 0 1 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2
28 1990 12–18 40.0% #132 1,593 0 1 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2
29 1991 5–9 35.7% #176 1,571 0 1 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,595 0 2
30 1992 11–10 52.4% #128 1,617 0 1 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,572 0 2
31 1993 2–13 13.3% #253 1,509 0 1 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,547 0 2
32 1994 0–1 0.0% #661 1,496 0 1 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,560 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,541 0 2