H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Diego Perez vs Jay Lapidus H2H: 2-1
Diego Perez holds a 2–1 lead over Jay Lapidus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Diego Perez leads 2–0 on clay, while Jay Lapidus leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Perez won the 1987 Boston second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 1987* | Boston | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Diego Perez | 6-4 6-4 | Jay Lapidus | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1984* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jay Lapidus | 6-7 6-4 6-2 6-2 | Diego Perez | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1984* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Diego Perez | 7-5 7-5 | Jay Lapidus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jay Lapidus | #621 | #34 | 0 | 1,798 | 76 | 106 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Perez | Jay Lapidus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #283 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #283 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #40 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #65 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #150 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #145 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |