H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Diego Perez vs Ricardo Acuna H2H: 2-0
Diego Perez holds a 2–0 lead over Ricardo Acuna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Diego Perez leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Perez won the 1987 Indianapolis second round 6-4 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1987* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Diego Perez | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | Ricardo Acuna | Match data |
| Nov 27, 1986* | Itaparica | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Diego Perez | 6-1 7-6 | Ricardo Acuna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ricardo Acuna | #1,264 | #47 | 19 | 1,729 | 60 | 101 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Perez | Ricardo Acuna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #312 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #151 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #151 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #171 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #199 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #163 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #530 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |