H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Diego Perez vs Wojtek Fibak H2H: 0-1
Wojtek Fibak holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Perez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wojtek Fibak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wojtek Fibak won the 1981 Palermo third round 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 1981* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Wojtek Fibak | 6-1 7-6 | Diego Perez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Wojtek Fibak | #566 | #10 | 0 | 2,089 | 520 | 309 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Diego Perez | Wojtek Fibak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 |
| 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 |
| 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 |
| 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 |
| 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 |
| 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 |
| 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 |
| 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 |
| 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 |
| 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |