H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Diego Perez vs Yannick Noah H2H: 1-4
Yannick Noah holds a 4–1 lead over Diego Perez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Yannick Noah leads 4–1 on clay. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1986 Rome quarterfinal 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1986* | Rome | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Yannick Noah | 7-6 6-4 | Diego Perez | Match data |
| Jul 22, 1985 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Yannick Noah | 6-1 6-3 | Diego Perez | Match data |
| May 18, 1984* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Diego Perez | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Yannick Noah | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1984* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Yannick Noah | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Diego Perez | Match data |
| Jul 21, 1982* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Yannick Noah | 7-6 0-6 6-1 | Diego Perez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,196 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Perez | Yannick Noah | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,887 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,085 | 1 | 14 |
| 24 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,996 | 1 | 14 |
| 25 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,954 | 1 | 17 |
| 26 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 1,994 | 1 | 19 |
| 27 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,921 | 1 | 21 |
| 28 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,940 | 1 | 22 |
| 29 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,875 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,724 | 1 | 23 |
| 31 | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,716 | 1 | 23 |
| 32 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,692 | 1 | 23 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,678 | 1 | 23 |