H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Dino Prizmic vs Elias Ymer H2H: 0-1
Elias Ymer holds a 1–0 lead over Dino Prizmic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elias Ymer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elias Ymer won the 2023 Stockholm fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 20
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Sweden
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2023* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Elias Ymer | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Dino Prizmic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dino Prizmic | #84 | #70 | 835 | 1,796 | 16 | 19 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elias Ymer | #183 | #105 | 534 | 1,696 | 29 | 68 | 29.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dino Prizmic | Elias Ymer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #475 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #769 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2025 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2026 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #160 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #170 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #155 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |