H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dmitry Tursunov vs James Auckland H2H: 1-0
Dmitry Tursunov holds a 1–0 lead over James Auckland in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dmitry Tursunov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dmitry Tursunov won the 2006 Mumbai quarterfinal 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 46
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2006* | Mumbai | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Dmitry Tursunov | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | James Auckland | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dmitry Tursunov | #815 | #20 | 2,290 | 1,914 | 223 | 215 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| James Auckland | #1,461 | #282 | 118 | 1,501 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dmitry Tursunov | James Auckland | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #174 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #80 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 42–31 | 57.5% | #22 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #89 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #390 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,705 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,698 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2013 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #29 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #110 | 1,746 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #411 | 1,676 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #487 | 1,622 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |