H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Dmitry Tursunov vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 1-0
Dmitry Tursunov holds a 1–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dmitry Tursunov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dmitry Tursunov won the 2013 Kuala Lumpur third round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2013* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Dmitry Tursunov | 7-5 6-0 | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2001 | US Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Dmitry Tursunov | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dmitry Tursunov | #815 | #20 | 2,290 | 1,914 | 223 | 215 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dmitry Tursunov | Rajeev Ram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #174 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #437 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #80 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 42–31 | 57.5% | #22 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #89 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,705 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,698 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2013 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #29 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #110 | 1,746 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #411 | 1,676 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #487 | 1,622 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |