H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dmitry Tursunov vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-0
Dmitry Tursunov holds a 1–0 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dmitry Tursunov leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dmitry Tursunov won the 2004 Wimbledon second round 6-3 7-6(5) 3-6 4-6 15-13.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Dmitry Tursunov | 6-3 7-6(5) 3-6 4-6 15-13 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dmitry Tursunov | #815 | #20 | 2,290 | 1,914 | 223 | 215 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dmitry Tursunov | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #174 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #80 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 42–31 | 57.5% | #22 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2008 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #89 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,705 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,698 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2013 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #29 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #110 | 1,746 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #411 | 1,676 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #487 | 1,622 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |