H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Dmitry Tursunov vs Steve Darcis H2H: 0-2
Steve Darcis holds a 2–0 lead over Dmitry Tursunov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Steve Darcis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Darcis won the 2011 US Open first round 6-7(4) 4-6 7-5 6-1 7-6(0).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Steve Darcis | 6-7(4) 4-6 7-5 6-1 7-6(0) | Dmitry Tursunov | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2011* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Steve Darcis | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Dmitry Tursunov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dmitry Tursunov | #815 | #20 | 2,290 | 1,914 | 223 | 215 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dmitry Tursunov | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #174 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #80 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 42–31 | 57.5% | #22 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2008 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #89 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,705 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2011 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,698 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2013 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #29 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #110 | 1,746 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #411 | 1,676 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #487 | 1,622 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |