H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dmitry Tursunov vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 0-1
Wayne Arthurs holds a 1–0 lead over Dmitry Tursunov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wayne Arthurs leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Arthurs won the 2006 San Jose fourth round 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2006* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Wayne Arthurs | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | Dmitry Tursunov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dmitry Tursunov | #815 | #20 | 2,290 | 1,914 | 223 | 215 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dmitry Tursunov | Wayne Arthurs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #174 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #80 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 42–31 | 57.5% | #22 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #89 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,705 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,698 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #29 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #110 | 1,746 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #411 | 1,676 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #487 | 1,622 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |