H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Dominik Hrbaty vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 0-1

Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Dominik Hrbaty in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2007 US Open first round 6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 6-7(6) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominik Hrbaty
SVK Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Hyung-Taik Lee
KOR Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hyung-Taik Lee #43 6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 6-7(6) 6-4 Dominik Hrbaty #36 Match data Aug 29, 2007* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominik Hrbaty #1,508 #12 1,830 1,941 328 299 52.3% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Hyung-Taik Lee #1,256 #36 864 1,798 121 156 43.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Hyung-Taik Lee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 0–1 0.0% #78 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 24–23 51.1% #40 1,715 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #241 1,509 0 0
20 1998 30–26 53.6% #46 1,690 0 1 1996 0–1 0.0% #283 1,497 0 0
21 1999 37–27 57.8% #21 1,700 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2000 38–28 57.6% #17 1,834 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 2001 28–29 49.1% #36 1,677 0 3 1999 1–2 33.3% #191 1,497 0 0
24 2002 22–28 44.0% #51 1,671 0 3 2000 7–5 58.3% #90 1,642 0 0
25 2003 25–26 49.0% #61 1,669 0 3 2001 9–19 32.1% #116 1,559 0 0
26 2004 41–25 62.1% #14 1,739 0 6 2002 11–14 44.0% #87 1,625 0 0
27 2005 37–25 59.7% #18 1,823 0 6 2003 18–23 43.9% #56 1,606 0 1
28 2006 31–26 54.4% #21 1,803 0 6 2004 16–16 50.0% #59 1,693 0 1
29 2007 9–21 30.0% #136 1,595 0 6 2005 10–19 34.5% #107 1,625 0 1
30 2008 4–8 33.3% #253 1,571 0 6 2006 18–15 54.5% #49 1,736 0 1
31 2009 2–5 28.6% #141 1,651 0 6 2007 21–23 47.7% #51 1,769 0 1
32 2010 0–1 0.0% #417 1,591 0 6 2008 9–17 34.6% #107 1,611 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #871 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 8 7 15 53.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 5 9 14 35.7% 23 15 38 60.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 11 10 21 52.4% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 22 18 40 55.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 20 14 34 58.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2002 12 17 29 41.4% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 9 11 20 45.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2001 3 14 17 17.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2004 29 12 41 70.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2005 24 15 39 61.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2006 20 16 36 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
29 2007 6 12 18 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 171 151 322 53.1% 119 104 223 53.4% 6 18 24 25.0% 32 26 58 55.2% — 84 107 191 44.0% 20 27 47 42.6% 17 19 36 47.2% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 577/626 of Dominik Hrbaty's and 199/206 of Hyung-Taik Lee's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1997 40/47 5.2 4.8 54.7% 73.2% 49.5% 60.2% 41.6% 62.6% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 50/56 5.0 4.6 53.7% 70.2% 50.9% 55.2% 43.7% 61.1% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 51/64 6.5 4.3 53.5% 73.4% 52.0% 59.9% 51.0% 63.3% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 60/66 6.8 4.1 54.7% 75.1% 51.4% 60.1% 40.4% 64.4% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 48/57 7.2 5.4 53.5% 71.4% 47.7% 56.8% 44.3% 60.6% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 48/50 4.0 4.1 57.4% 69.6% 48.7% 55.8% 40.8% 60.7% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 50/51 4.5 3.0 60.4% 71.9% 52.0% 54.4% 42.5% 63.8% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 63/66 4.5 2.9 63.7% 71.6% 53.9% 66.7% 43.9% 65.1% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 62/62 5.1 3.6 58.5% 70.4% 50.6% 64.8% 43.1% 62.2% 40.4% 2003 40/41 3.5 2.0 63.5% 68.1% 51.1% 53.0% 35.7% 62.0% 38.2%
28 2006 57/57 4.2 4.5 55.7% 70.2% 48.0% 59.2% 41.8% 60.5% 39.2% 2004 29/32 3.4 2.3 64.4% 69.4% 52.1% 53.8% 44.6% 63.6% 36.2%
29 2007 30/30 3.5 4.7 55.9% 67.4% 45.0% 47.0% 36.0% 57.5% 38.3% 2005 28/29 3.4 2.3 61.0% 68.0% 51.0% 54.1% 37.2% 61.8% 34.9%
30 2008 10/12 2.2 4.5 60.2% 66.6% 40.0% 43.8% 55.8% 56.2% 45.7% 2006 32/33 3.7 1.6 66.9% 68.9% 52.8% 60.1% 48.4% 63.9% 37.4%
31 2009 7/7 2.4 2.7 57.9% 66.4% 44.3% 42.4% 39.2% 57.3% 32.3% 2007 44/44 3.0 1.6 63.0% 70.3% 52.7% 53.0% 31.2% 64.0% 37.1%
32 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 47.8% 40.9% 45.8% 54.5% 25.0% 43.5% 32.7% 2008 25/26 2.8 2.5 63.8% 65.5% 48.3% 52.8% 39.7% 59.3% 36.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 60.0% 50.0% 63.6% 33.3% 55.6% 37.8%
Career — 577/627 5.1 4.1 56.8% 71.3% 50.0% 58.5% 43.1% 62.1% 39.2% — 199/277 3.3 2.0 63.7% 68.6% 51.5% 54.4% 38.7% 62.6% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1486 101.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1715 142.2 +1.61 -0.42 1.004 50.2% -92 +38 — 49.1% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 11–10 (52%) 102.0 -1.58 1995 1510 105.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.15
20 1998 1690 141.2 -0.50 +0.95 1.009 50.1% -58 +83 — 52.9% +0.21 7–10 (41%) 11–8 (58%) 98.0 -0.64 1996 1497 100.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.10
21 1999 1700 144.9 +1.84 +1.64 1.086 51.5% -29 +125 — 54.6% +0.55 14–10 (58%) 9–14 (39%) 99.7 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 1835 148.4 +2.28 +2.25 1.120 51.8% -19 -21 — 55.5% +0.54 11–10 (52%) 12–12 (50%) 101.1 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 1677 137.6 -1.21 +1.03 0.983 49.6% +75 -12 — 50.0% -0.07 10–10 (50%) 19–11 (63%) 101.7 +1.46 1999 1498 110.3 — — — — — — — 37.5% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.19
24 2002 1671 135.6 -1.20 +0.37 0.964 49.6% +27 -7 — 43.9% -0.24 7–7 (50%) 4–10 (29%) 96.5 +0.59 2000 1643 126.3 — — — — +16 — — 55.2% +0.38 0–1 4–2 (67%) — +0.44
25 2003 1670 138.9 +1.39 +1.61 1.088 51.2% -3 +27 — 50.8% +0.13 4–12 (25%) 9–11 (45%) 92.0 -0.71 2001 1560 126.2 — — — — -10 +45 — 37.1% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 -0.31
26 2004 1740 144.0 +2.13 +2.58 1.135 52.4% +38 -62 -263 58.5% +0.63 14–7 (67%) 12–9 (57%) 104.5 +2.00 2002 1626 130.4 — — — — -62 -53 +45 47.8% -0.10 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 -0.15
27 2005 1823 147.1 -0.18 +3.32 1.071 51.2% +25 -104 -310 56.9% +0.52 8–8 (50%) 13–11 (54%) 98.4 +1.59 2003 1607 137.1 +0.37 +1.31 1.005 49.8% +38 -41 -12 43.6% -0.18 6–7 (46%) 5–12 (29%) 95.9 -1.24
28 2006 1803 139.3 -1.67 +2.09 0.992 49.8% +39 -81 -302 48.6% -0.03 14–8 (64%) 4–7 (36%) 102.7 +2.37 2004 1694 132.8 0.00 +0.22 0.996 50.1% -22 -76 +2 51.3% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) 99.5 -0.09
29 2007 1596 123.7 -3.83 +0.87 0.902 47.6% +90 +13 — 36.8% -1.00 0–6 (0%) 10–8 (56%) 92.8 +1.43 2005 1626 129.9 -0.24 -0.93 0.913 48.4% -33 +14 +61 39.7% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) 94.6 -1.85
30 2008 1571 124.3 -3.12 +4.09 1.044 50.2% +62 +9 — 33.3% -0.80 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.05 2006 1737 133.5 +1.59 +0.54 1.037 50.7% -41 — -11 52.3% +0.01 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 110.0 -0.52
31 2009 1651 116.6 -2.65 -1.02 0.757 44.5% +45 — — 36.8% -1.52 0–2 1–0 — +0.05 2007 1770 137.1 +0.81 +0.33 1.029 50.3% +8 -188 -69 47.7% -0.11 5–7 (42%) 9–14 (39%) 97.7 +0.89
32 2010 1592 105.9 -0.65 +0.69 0.578 37.9% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32 2008 1611 130.0 -2.82 -0.10 0.900 48.3% +78 -31 — 43.8% -0.59 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 98.7 +0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1580 100.2 -0.70 -4.74 0.851 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.05
34 2012 1587 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1942 145.2 +0.15 +1.64 1.034 50.5% +18 +24 -291 51.1% +0.14 96–102 (48%) 115–112 (51%) 97.7 +1.01 — 1799 138.7 +0.12 +0.29 0.985 49.7% -2 -43 +2 45.8% -0.27 37–52 (42%) 54–58 (48%) 99.2 -0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.