H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Dominik Hrbaty vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 1-2

Ivo Karlovic holds a 2–1 lead over Dominik Hrbaty in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ivo Karlovic leads 1–0 on carpet, while Dominik Hrbaty leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominik Hrbaty won the 2006 Roland Garros second round 4-6 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominik Hrbaty
SVK Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 2, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Dominik Hrbaty #24 4-6 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5 6-2 Ivo Karlovic #52 Match data
Oct 22, 2005* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Ivo Karlovic #86 7-6(9) 7-6(3) Dominik Hrbaty #22 Match data
Oct 28, 2004* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Carpet Ivo Karlovic #62 7-6(5) 5-7 6-4 Dominik Hrbaty #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dominik Hrbaty #1,508 #12 1,830 1,948 326 296 52.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 0–1 0.0% #78 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 24–23 51.1% #40 1,715 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 30–26 53.6% #46 1,689 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1999 37–27 57.8% #21 1,700 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2000 38–27 58.5% #17 1,843 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 2001 28–29 49.1% #36 1,678 0 3 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 2002 22–28 44.0% #51 1,670 0 3 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0
25 2003 25–26 49.0% #61 1,670 0 3 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0
26 2004 40–24 62.5% #14 1,742 0 6 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0
27 2005 37–25 59.7% #18 1,823 0 6 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0
28 2006 31–26 54.4% #21 1,803 0 6 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3
29 2007 9–21 30.0% #136 1,594 0 6 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4
30 2008 3–7 30.0% #253 1,563 0 6 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4
31 2009 2–5 28.6% #141 1,649 0 6 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4
32 2010 0–1 0.0% #417 1,589 0 6 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8
38 — — — — — — — 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8