H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Dominik Hrbaty vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 1-2
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 2–1 lead over Dominik Hrbaty in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominik Hrbaty won the 2003 Auckland fourth round 6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2003* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Dominik Hrbaty | 6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(4) | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2001* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-3 6-1 | Dominik Hrbaty | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2001* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-4 6-3 | Dominik Hrbaty | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominik Hrbaty | #1,508 | #12 | 1,830 | 1,948 | 326 | 296 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominik Hrbaty | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #78 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #40 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #46 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #17 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2001 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2003 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #61 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2005 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #18 | 1,823 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2006 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #253 | 1,563 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,589 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |