H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Dominik Hrbaty vs Laurence Tieleman H2H: 1-0

Dominik Hrbaty holds a 1–0 lead over Laurence Tieleman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominik Hrbaty leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominik Hrbaty won the 2000 Japan Open round of 32 7-6(5) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominik Hrbaty
SVK Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Laurence Tieleman
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominik Hrbaty #33 7-6(5) 7-5 Laurence Tieleman #142 Match data Oct 12, 2000* R32 Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominik Hrbaty #1,508 #12 1,830 1,941 328 299 52.3% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Laurence Tieleman #1,442 #76 625 1,653 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Laurence Tieleman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 0–1 0.0% #78 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 24–23 51.1% #40 1,715 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 30–26 53.6% #46 1,690 0 1 1993 4–4 50.0% #148 1,539 0 0
21 1999 37–27 57.8% #21 1,700 0 2 1994 0–1 0.0% #163 1,533 0 0
22 2000 38–28 57.6% #17 1,834 0 2 1995 2–4 33.3% #197 1,525 0 0
23 2001 28–29 49.1% #36 1,677 0 3 1996 1–4 20.0% #240 1,483 0 0
24 2002 22–28 44.0% #51 1,671 0 3 1997 0–2 0.0% #297 1,458 0 0
25 2003 25–26 49.0% #61 1,669 0 3 1998 10–7 58.8% #107 1,594 0 0
26 2004 41–25 62.1% #14 1,739 0 6 1999 14–21 40.0% #87 1,605 0 0
27 2005 37–25 59.7% #18 1,823 0 6 2000 10–19 34.5% #136 1,547 0 0
28 2006 31–26 54.4% #21 1,803 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2007 9–21 30.0% #136 1,595 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2008 4–8 33.3% #253 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2009 2–5 28.6% #141 1,651 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2010 0–1 0.0% #417 1,591 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Laurence Tieleman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 8 7 15 53.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 5 9 14 35.7% 23 15 38 60.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
21 1999 11 10 21 52.4% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2000 22 18 40 55.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2001 20 14 34 58.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2002 12 17 29 41.4% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2003 9 11 20 45.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2004 29 12 41 70.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1999 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2005 24 15 39 61.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2000 8 10 18 44.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
28 2006 20 16 36 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 6 12 18 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 171 151 322 53.1% 119 104 223 53.4% 6 18 24 25.0% 32 26 58 55.2% — 19 31 50 38.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 20 18 38 52.6% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 577/626 of Dominik Hrbaty's and 87/102 of Laurence Tieleman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Laurence Tieleman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1997 40/47 5.2 4.8 54.7% 73.2% 49.5% 60.2% 41.6% 62.6% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 50/56 5.0 4.6 53.7% 70.2% 50.9% 55.2% 43.7% 61.1% 39.2% 1993 8/8 7.0 5.1 50.6% 77.1% 53.4% 68.2% 45.1% 66.3% 33.8%
21 1999 51/64 6.5 4.3 53.5% 73.4% 52.0% 59.9% 51.0% 63.3% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 60/66 6.8 4.1 54.7% 75.1% 51.4% 60.1% 40.4% 64.4% 39.9% 1995 5/6 6.4 4.8 48.4% 67.5% 47.5% 63.8% 50.6% 57.1% 28.1%
23 2001 48/57 7.2 5.4 53.5% 71.4% 47.7% 56.8% 44.3% 60.6% 38.7% 1996 3/5 3.3 7.3 47.5% 73.9% 51.1% 61.3% 39.9% 62.1% 34.0%
24 2002 48/50 4.0 4.1 57.4% 69.6% 48.7% 55.8% 40.8% 60.7% 37.8% 1997 2/2 8.0 8.5 54.8% 68.1% 38.6% 46.8% 28.6% 54.8% 33.6%
25 2003 50/51 4.5 3.0 60.4% 71.9% 52.0% 54.4% 42.5% 63.8% 39.3% 1998 17/17 6.9 6.1 51.7% 78.8% 49.4% 58.3% 39.8% 64.2% 33.9%
26 2004 63/66 4.5 2.9 63.7% 71.6% 53.9% 66.7% 43.9% 65.1% 39.6% 1999 32/35 6.6 4.3 54.6% 75.3% 50.7% 54.8% 37.8% 64.1% 33.4%
27 2005 62/62 5.1 3.6 58.5% 70.4% 50.6% 64.8% 43.1% 62.2% 40.4% 2000 20/29 9.6 5.6 49.3% 73.6% 46.7% 54.3% 35.2% 59.9% 31.9%
28 2006 57/57 4.2 4.5 55.7% 70.2% 48.0% 59.2% 41.8% 60.5% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 30/30 3.5 4.7 55.9% 67.4% 45.0% 47.0% 36.0% 57.5% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 10/12 2.2 4.5 60.2% 66.6% 40.0% 43.8% 55.8% 56.2% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 7/7 2.4 2.7 57.9% 66.4% 44.3% 42.4% 39.2% 57.3% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 47.8% 40.9% 45.8% 54.5% 25.0% 43.5% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 577/627 5.1 4.1 56.8% 71.3% 50.0% 58.5% 43.1% 62.1% 39.2% — 87/103 7.3 5.3 51.9% 75.1% 49.3% 57.2% 38.9% 62.7% 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Laurence Tieleman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1486 101.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1715 142.2 +1.61 -0.42 1.004 50.2% -92 +38 — 49.1% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 11–10 (52%) 102.0 -1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1690 141.2 -0.50 +0.95 1.009 50.1% -58 +83 — 52.9% +0.21 7–10 (41%) 11–8 (58%) 98.0 -0.64 1993 1539 101.3 +0.30 -0.77 1.004 48.9% — — +98 47.6% -0.52 1–1 1–1 — +0.78
21 1999 1700 144.9 +1.84 +1.64 1.086 51.5% -29 +125 — 54.6% +0.55 14–10 (58%) 9–14 (39%) 99.7 -0.52 1994 1533 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 2–0 — -0.18
22 2000 1835 148.4 +2.28 +2.25 1.120 51.8% -19 -21 — 55.5% +0.54 11–10 (52%) 12–12 (50%) 101.1 +0.54 1995 1526 97.9 -1.88 -3.07 0.656 44.0% — — +108 30.8% -1.69 1–0 1–0 — +0.41
23 2001 1677 137.6 -1.21 +1.03 0.983 49.6% +75 -12 — 50.0% -0.07 10–10 (50%) 19–11 (63%) 101.7 +1.46 1996 1484 97.3 -0.40 +0.45 0.896 48.4% — — +155 27.3% -0.91 0–1 0–2 — +0.53
24 2002 1671 135.6 -1.20 +0.37 0.964 49.6% +27 -7 — 43.9% -0.24 7–7 (50%) 4–10 (29%) 96.5 +0.59 1997 1459 103.0 -1.61 -3.02 0.744 44.8% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 — — +0.07
25 2003 1670 138.9 +1.39 +1.61 1.088 51.2% -3 +27 — 50.8% +0.13 4–12 (25%) 9–11 (45%) 92.0 -0.71 1998 1594 123.4 +1.29 -2.10 0.947 50.0% -107 — +163 53.7% +0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 107.0 +0.20
26 2004 1740 144.0 +2.13 +2.58 1.135 52.4% +38 -62 -263 58.5% +0.63 14–7 (67%) 12–9 (57%) 104.5 +2.00 1999 1605 122.2 +1.18 -3.84 0.930 48.7% -38 — +94 45.3% -0.59 3–7 (30%) 7–8 (47%) 99.6 +1.02
27 2005 1823 147.1 -0.18 +3.32 1.071 51.2% +25 -104 -310 56.9% +0.52 8–8 (50%) 13–11 (54%) 98.4 +1.59 2000 1548 109.7 -1.89 -4.30 0.796 46.5% +22 -109 +70 37.9% -0.71 2–2 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 98.2 +1.41
28 2006 1803 139.3 -1.67 +2.09 0.992 49.8% +39 -81 -302 48.6% -0.03 14–8 (64%) 4–7 (36%) 102.7 +2.37 2001 1533 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 1596 123.7 -3.83 +0.87 0.902 47.6% +90 +13 — 36.8% -1.00 0–6 (0%) 10–8 (56%) 92.8 +1.43 2002 1503 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1571 124.3 -3.12 +4.09 1.044 50.2% +62 +9 — 33.3% -0.80 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1651 116.6 -2.65 -1.02 0.757 44.5% +45 — — 36.8% -1.52 0–2 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1592 105.9 -0.65 +0.69 0.578 37.9% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1587 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1942 145.2 +0.15 +1.64 1.034 50.5% +18 +24 -291 51.1% +0.14 96–102 (48%) 115–112 (51%) 97.7 +1.01 — 1653 115.4 +0.12 -3.11 0.882 48.1% -24 -109 +118 42.8% -0.61 12–17 (41%) 21–21 (50%) 102.1 +4.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.