H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dominik Hrbaty vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 2-1
Dominik Hrbaty holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Philippoussis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dominik Hrbaty leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Dominik Hrbaty won the 2006 Adelaide fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2006* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Dominik Hrbaty | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2005* | Metz | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Dominik Hrbaty | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
| Nov 16, 2000* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Mark Philippoussis | 1-6 7-6(1) 7-6(1) | Dominik Hrbaty | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominik Hrbaty | #1,508 | #12 | 1,830 | 1,948 | 326 | 296 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominik Hrbaty | Mark Philippoussis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #78 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #40 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1998 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #46 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1999 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2000 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #17 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2001 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2002 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2003 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #61 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2005 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #18 | 1,823 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2006 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #253 | 1,563 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,589 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |