H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Dominik Hrbaty vs Martin Verkerk H2H: 0-2
Martin Verkerk holds a 2–0 lead over Dominik Hrbaty in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Verkerk leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martin Verkerk won the 2003 Paris Masters third round 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2003* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Martin Verkerk | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Dominik Hrbaty | Match data |
| May 23, 2003* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Martin Verkerk | 6-4 7-5 | Dominik Hrbaty | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominik Hrbaty | #1,508 | #12 | 1,830 | 1,948 | 326 | 296 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Martin Verkerk | #984 | #14 | 1,485 | 1,862 | 56 | 64 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominik Hrbaty | Martin Verkerk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #78 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #40 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #46 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #17 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #86 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #19 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #61 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #18 | 1,823 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #678 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #253 | 1,563 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,589 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |