H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Dominik Hrbaty vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 1-4

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 4–1 lead over Dominik Hrbaty in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2000 Tokyo semifinal 6-3 6-4.

SVK Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 14, 2000* Tokyo ATP 250 SF Hard Nicolas Lapentti #16 6-3 6-4 Dominik Hrbaty #33 Match data
Apr 28, 2000* Barcelona ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #8 6-2 6-2 Dominik Hrbaty #15 Match data
Oct 28, 1999* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #11 3-6 6-4 6-3 Dominik Hrbaty #23 Match data
Jul 23, 1999* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #22 7-5 6-3 Dominik Hrbaty #19 Match data
Sep 11, 1997* Marbella ATP 250 R32 Clay Dominik Hrbaty #49 6-3 6-2 Nicolas Lapentti #85 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dominik Hrbaty #1,508 #12 1,830 1,948 326 296 52.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 0–1 0.0% #78 1,485 0 0 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1997 24–23 51.1% #40 1,715 0 0 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 1998 30–26 53.6% #46 1,689 0 1 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 1999 37–27 57.8% #21 1,700 0 2 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 2000 38–27 58.5% #17 1,843 0 2 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 2001 28–29 49.1% #36 1,678 0 3 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 2002 22–28 44.0% #51 1,670 0 3 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 2003 25–26 49.0% #61 1,670 0 3 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 2004 40–24 62.5% #14 1,742 0 6 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 2005 37–25 59.7% #18 1,823 0 6 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 2006 31–26 54.4% #21 1,803 0 6 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 2007 9–21 30.0% #136 1,594 0 6 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 2008 3–7 30.0% #253 1,563 0 6 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 2009 2–5 28.6% #141 1,649 0 6 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 2010 0–1 0.0% #417 1,589 0 6 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5